3-

(b)in respect of the crimes listed in the sequence 1 through 17, one year and ten months of imprisonment;

[Criminal Power] On August 11, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment by the Seoul Northern District Court for the charge of forging official documents, etc. and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 25 of the same year. On June 7, 2018, the Suwon District Court sentenced the Defendant to eight months of imprisonment for fraud at the Suwon District Court for the said year.

8. 10. The above judgment was finalized.

1. "2018 Highest 3120";

A. On September 28, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who works in the Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, by phoneing to the victim E, and “The number of days of interest is interest to USD 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, would be repaid without any mold as the end of the early tiny leave in October.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the interest even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the absence of any specific income or property even though he did not receive the interest at a high interest rate.

The Defendant received from the victim each remittance of KRW 3.5 million on September 29, 2017, from the victim, to the G Association account in the name of the Defendant’s fatherF, and KRW 3.5 million on September 29, 2017, respectively.

B. On September 30, 2017, the Defendant stated that “Around September 30, 2017, the Defendant borrowed KRW 3 million from the victim by telephone, which would have been repaid in a lump sum with KRW 7 million prior to the lending.”

However, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the interest even if he borrowed money from the victim due to the absence of any specific income or property even though he did not receive the interest at a high interest rate.

The Defendant received 3 million won from the victim to the G Association account in the name of the Defendant’s father and wife, from the victim.

C. On October 15, 2017, the Defendant concluded that “Around October 15, 2017, the Defendant would have repaid the victim with a little amount of money to be used for the number of days, which would have to be repaid in a lump sum.”

However, the facts are the number of days for which the defendant receives high interest.