However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around May 2015, the Defendant forged a public document, at the Defendant’s residence located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, deleted “C” as indicated in the vehicle sign number column for national merit, and written “D” using a private pension.

For the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a description of a national or official interest vehicle under the name of the head of the State Veterans Administration, which is an official document.

2. On October 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) kept and exercised a false official document on the front glass part of the vehicle operated by the Defendant, as if the forged official document, was duly prepared at a parking lot for the disabled at the 505 U.S. Si, Hari-ri, Hari-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City; and (b) held it on the front glass part of the vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of enforcement photographs, seizure records, and Acts and subordinate statutes of the Automobile Registration Register;

1. Relevant Article 225 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 225 of the Official Document), Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of forged official document), and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Where there are grounds for particularly taking into account the participation in an act of crime or motive for an act of crime in the mitigated area (4 months to 1 year) of Class 1 (non-business, non-organization), such as forgery, alteration, etc. of official documents, etc. on the sentencing guidelines;

2. That there are circumstances to consider the fact that the defendant's decision of sentencing reflects the error, that there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the same criminal record and suspended execution, and that there is reason to consider the circumstance that the defendant is forged with the vehicle number newly operated while transferring the existing vehicle to a person who was injured on duty;