2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant: (b) committed the instant crime; (c) committed the instant crime despite having the history of criminal punishment by committing the same kind of violent crime and larceny; (d) committed the instant crime; (b) committed the instant crime; (c) the Defendant was not completely recovered from the amount of assault; and (d) committed the favorable sentencing factors, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (c) the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines and the scope of recommended sentencing guidelines, which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant records and pleadings, including the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime; and (d) did not focus on the degree of assault; and (e) other favorable sentencing factors that are the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant records and pleadings, such as the following circumstances (one year to three years and June 10).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.