beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.04.27 2016고단2950

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 3, 2016, the Defendant driven a cwheeled vehicle under the influence of alcohol leveling of about 0.207% from the section of approximately 500 meters, i.e., the blood alcohol level, from the front of the end-distance in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the road 19:54, with a joint signature of the same Gu, around 500 meters.

2. When the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at the same date and at the same place as paragraph 1, while driving the said two-wheeled vehicle, Seoul: (a) the Defendant informed the Defendant of the name and resident registration number of the Defendant’s pro-friendly “H” and used another person’s resident registration number on his/her part, by driving the said two-wheeled vehicle from the police officer E, F, or G

3. Counterfeiting a private signature and exercising a signature on the investigation;

A. The Defendant involved in the crime of “the notice of the result of the drinking driving control” and “the statement of the circumstances of the driver at the State” committed at the same time, at the same place as paragraph 1, and at the same time, at the place, and on the screen of a portable police device (the police PDA), signed H with the sign of “H on the front page” of the notice as a result of the control of drinking driving, and used the sign of “H on the front page of the driver’s statement report on the state of the driver at the State,” without authority, for the purpose of signing and exercising the signature “H on the sex column of the driver’s statement report on the state of the driver at the State.” The Defendant forged the signature of the above H without authority, and exercised his signature by delivering the above signature to E as if the signature was genuine.

B. On June 16, 2016, the Defendant involved in the crime of “suspect interrogation protocol” signed the name of H “H” in the column of “person who has made a statement” and “person who has made a statement” in the interrogation protocol prepared by the above J, and forged the above H’s signature without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her authority, and issued it to the J who may know of the fact that the above signature was genuine, and then signed the forged name in the name of H by issuing it to him/her as if the signature was duly formed.