If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 15:40 on January 17, 2014, the Defendant was required to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting the breath alcohol measuring instrument over about 30 minutes, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and smelling on the face, while driving Cing-con-car on the front side of the breatha warrant in front of the Ting-con-car on the road.

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Report on the situation of driving under the influence of alcohol, the ledger of use of a measuring instrument for drinking, and the circumstantial report of the drinking driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports (for the defendant to undergo a pulmonary operation, it is sufficient to recognize the facts charged in full view of the following facts: (a) the period of time has elapsed since 1992 when the defendant underwent the pulmonary operation, and there was a record of punishment of a fine due to drinking driving around 20

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines for the punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.