If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. Around May 18, 2015, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 21:00 on May 18, 2015, the Defendant: (b) loaded the clothes of the clothes room operated by the wife of the victim C in front of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul; and (c) walked the bags; (d) the victim resisted the victim, and (e) resisted the bicycle for delivery, which was owned by the victim, so that the Defendant can cover the repair cost of KRW 200,000,000.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property equivalent to KRW 200,000 in the market price owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Punishment Act of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, on May 18, 2015, is a police officer under the influence of alcohol while under the influence of alcohol while being arrested and detained in the act of committing the crime described in paragraph 1 at the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, a police box around May 21, 2015 and committing the crime described in paragraph 1 at the Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, a police box, and the victim C, who resisted the crime, and being arrested and detained in the act of committing a crime committed in the course of drinking.

Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

approximately 20 minutes of disturbance, such as referring to the expression “,” and referring a large sound, etc.

As a result, the Defendant, who was drunk, committed an act of disturbance by scambling the horses and actions conducted by the Bupyeong Police Station E boxes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. C’s written statement (including photographs attached thereto);

1. Violence and the cancellation of the head of a government office shall apply to the investigation report to a person suspected of being arrested in flagrant offender, his/her name and non-flagrant person;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbance for main purposes and the selection of fines);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows, and the arguments of this case are shown in the arguments of this case, such as the age, sex, and environment of the defendant.