When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant served as a director of the real estate investment advisory company from February 2, 2007 to December 2006, respectively, as the head of Han Bank D branch, etc., and from February 2007 to December 201, the Defendant is currently serving as a full-time adviser E who provides musical performance planning and real estate consulting services from April 2014.

1. On June 2016, 200 million won, the Defendant received a request from the victim FF to arrange a loan of KRW 100 billion for the Liber acquisition fund from the lower court, which was known to the lower court, to acquire money by iceing the confirmation of the intent of the loan related to the loan, as it is necessary to transfer money, such as the agreement amount of two cases filed in connection with the business of the Mapo Stock Company E.

The Defendant on September 1, 2016, at the 12nd H office of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Building, the 12nd office of the 12nd office of the company, “it is likely that the Defendant

section 3.

In that sense, there is doubt as to whether a person who arranged a loan to a securities company has an intention to receive a loan, and 200 million won is entrusted to D. In that sense, it received 200 million won in advance in the form of fees.

The securities company shall show and keep the loan broker, and if the loan is not accepted after one month, it shall be returned immediately.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the Defendant did not think of the borrower's intention of lending or the symbol of credit in connection with the lending brokerage, but did not immediately think of the borrower's intention to use the loan in the agreement amount of the above accusation case as well as did not pay additional dues exceeding KRW 900 million at the time, and was bad credit standing. Since the borrower was accused of such a complaint, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to immediately return the loan even if the borrower was paid money under the name of the borrower's intent of lending or credit symbol.

In other words, the defendant receives a total of KRW 200,000 from the injured party, i.e., one million in front of the check under the pretext of confirming the intent of the loan and the prior fee.