However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

성명 불상자( 위 챗 닉네임 ‘D’) 등은 검찰을 사칭하면서 불특정 다수의 사람들에게 전화를 걸어 기망한 후 피해자들 로부터 금원을 송금 받는 전화금융 사기( 속칭 ‘ 보이스 피 싱’) 범행을 하기로 계획하였다.

After that, a person who was unable to obtain his name, etc. was liable to withdraw the telephone financing fraud.

E을 통해 피고인을 소개 받고, 성명 불상 자가 위챗을 통해 피고인에게 지시를 하면 피고인은 이에 따라 대출 신청자를 만 나 금원을 교부 받은 후 위 금원을 성명 불상 자가 지시하는 방법으로 전달하고 일당 또는 전달하는 금액의 일정 비율을 받기로 모의하였다.

On April 27, 2017, the name-free boxes, etc. were called the victim F by telephone, and the victim's account was used for the crime.

(1) send money to the Financial Supervisory Service to prove that the money deposited in the said account is not related to a crime;

The money deposited in the said account should be transferred to the G account as he/she has to trace the account, and he/she has received KRW 50 million from the damaged person to the G Name Bank account (H) on the same day.

On the same day, the Defendant introduced G in the high speed terminal station in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, as “I member of the I member of the I member of the I member of the On-Site Financial Team at Han Bank,” and introduced G as “I member of the I member of the On-Site Financial Team at Han Bank,” and demanded G to withdraw KRW 50 million, which was remitted by the victimized person at the check, and attempted to deliver. However, the Defendant did not receive the above money from the police officer arrested who was dispatched by G upon receiving a report from the staff member of the bank who was called to receive a large amount of withdrawal.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with name-free wounded persons, intended to receive property from the victim, but did not bring about such intent but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;