대여금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 126,182,907 and KRW 110,315,596 among the Plaintiff’s KRW 25% per annum from August 7, 2016 to March 16, 2017.
In full view of the respective entries in Gap evidence 1 through 10 (including the provisional number) and the overall purport of the pleadings, it is recognized that the cause of the claim is the same as that in the separate sheet (the "creditor" shall be deemed to be the "Plaintiff," and the "debtor" shall be deemed to be the "Defendant," and thus, the defendant is liable to pay the plaintiff the unpaid principal and interest and the delayed damages
Although the defendant alleged to the effect that "in addition to the amount recognized by the plaintiff, the additional repayment of KRW 30,000,000 was made," there is no evidence to acknowledge it, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.
In addition, the circumstance that the defendant filed a petition for bankruptcy does not affect the claim of this case.
If so, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.