Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The Defendant and B are in a internal relationship from October 2017 to August 2018.

On August 10, 2018, the Defendant, at around 13:00, committed a dispute with the victim B in the Dmocom E operated by the Defendant in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, and the Defendant, out of the room, opened a Mask Turkey with the victim's door, opened the Mask Turkey with the victim's face, shoulder, etc., and caused injury to the victim, such as climatic salt, tension, etc., for about two weeks in need of medical treatment due to drinking and launching.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement corresponding to the police interrogation protocol concerning B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (related to the submission of a B diagnosis report);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The part concerning dismissal of prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. On May 30, 2018, the Defendant sent a message to the victim B, who was in an internal-related relationship, as if he were to do so, using a cell phone, saying, the Defendant sent a message to the victim B, “Bara,” and at around 23:04 of the same day, “I find a foot any longer than one time,” and sent the message as if he had found the victim’s home, and affixes the following seals thereon.

5. Around 23:51, at around 23:51, the message “I am the same as her husband’s, and the message was sent to the victim, “I am the same as the son’s, and the Mara Mara Mara Mara Mara Mara Mara, I am the same as the starting.”

2. According to Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act, the facts charged in this part of the judgment cannot be prosecuted against the express intent of the victim for a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records of this case, the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant on June 18, 2019, which was after the prosecution of this case, and this part of the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.