beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.12.21 2016고단4214

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, from around October 2010 to February 2013, is a person who received a proposal for the operation of the “C”, which was prepared for the operation of the PCB inspection company around the summer, and operated D and the above “C” jointly from around October 2012 to around February 2013, during the period of operating the PCB sales business (PCB; hereinafter “PCB”).

The Defendant, along with D, sought a loan of KRW 1 billion as lease deposit and business operation expenses incurred in leasing PCB inspection equipment with a market price of at least KRW 1 billion from the said D, and there is a need to obtain a loan from the bank for the purpose of financing equipment purchase, and if the said “C” as the Defendant’s representative purchases the PCB inspection equipment from the said “B” as if it were to purchase the PCB inspection equipment from the said “B,” the Defendant, upon receipt of the proposal, received a false commodity supply contract and received a loan from the bank for the purpose of purchasing the equipment, and paid the loan as lease deposit, and then intended to obtain the loan by means of providing it as security from the bank as if it was purchased from the “C’s operation.”

Around October 15, 2012, the Defendant and D have completed a contract for goods supply (including DSV-II-II-EU 1 unit, VERMAT 4 unit) as if the Defendant and D were to purchase 8 pB inspection equipment (DSV-II-EU 1 unit, and VERMA 4 unit) equivalent to the total market value of KRW 740 million from the “B in the operation of the Defendant even though there was no fact that the Defendant and D had concluded a contract for the PC inspection equipment at the above place of business on or around October 15, 2012, the Defendant and D were to purchase from the “B” (the aforementioned equipment was planned that D was to be installed from D D D D D D D D D D D D g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g g d g g g g g g