However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 04:00 on June 20, 2014, the Defendant: (a) stated that he was subject to a notification disposition by committing an act of disturbance of drinking in front of the restaurant in front of the Busan District District District B in Busan District; (b) stated that he was able to d (23 years old); (c) took twice the cream of the Busan District Police Station C District D (23 years old); and (d) recommended the said D to have her home home, the Defendant, as her hand, carried the flaps of the said D; and (c) obstructed the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime prevention and maintenance of order of the said D, by breaking the external flaps, thereby obstructing the Defendant from performing his duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is that the defendant repents his wrong and reflects his wrong, that the defendant has no criminal record of being punished beyond the fine due to the same criminal act, and that the defendant has no criminal record of the same criminal act. In addition, the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances, contents, age, character and conduct, shall be comprehensively considered.