A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won and by imprisonment of six months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A does not pay the above fine.

[criminal record] On June 5, 2015, Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, and the judgment became final and conclusive upon receipt of a decision to dismiss an appeal on September 16, 2015 at the Gwangju District Court, the imprisonment of one year and six months at the Gwangju District Court, and November 24, 2015.

[2] Defendant B had been engaged in the lending business by providing a personal loan to the lending business entity of F in the name of “F” from May 2013 to February 2014, as an employee. Defendant A received several loans from Defendant B from Defendant B from around 2013, but did not change the loans.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime - In his office located on the sixth floor of the Macheon G building on August 2013, Defendant B leased KRW 15 million in total to Defendant A, on the following grounds: (a) the finding of Defendant A and the vehicle at hand in the name of the actual owner of the (A) are located in the name of Sari-J in the name of Sari-Sari-H; and (b) the lending of money as security; (c) around August 2013 and around September 2, 2013.

Defendant

A with the above lending of money from Defendant B, “A is a debt holder H, and A is a joint guarantor to prepare a loan certificate,” and the victim H’s seal imprint certificate and seal affixed to the debtor. However, the certificate of the seal imprint certificate, etc. merely accepted the victim’s false statement that “I will use the name of the vehicle in the name of another (A)” and did not obtain consent to the preparation of the loan certificate in the name of the victim (hereinafter “the first loan certificate”). After June 2014, Defendant A knew that he prepared the above loan certificate from the victim without the victim’s consent on the grounds on which the right to collateral security on the register of another vehicle was established on the register of a vehicle. At that time, Defendant B also did not obtain consent from the victim.