All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. As to the guilty portion of the Defendant, the Defendant did not inflict an injury upon the Defendant in excess of the victim D (E after the name of the Defendant was opened) at the Defendant’s home located in Heung-si around 07:40 on March 18, 201.

(M) 2.2

With respect to the acquittal portion of the prosecutor, the court below found the defendant not guilty on March 17, 201, on the ground that the facts charged that the defendant inflicted a bodily injury on D and H before the defendant's house located in Si interesting City C was not proven with reasonable doubt, and there is an error of law of misunderstanding of facts.

2. Determination

A. The court below duly adopted and examined the defendant's assertion of misunderstanding of facts, i.e., the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below: ① the victim stated in the investigative agency that "I was flick outside of the main body of the defendant, and children who were flick away from the inside of the dwelling space," (No. 2011-type No. 22302 investigation records No. 69)." The court below stated in the court of the court below that "I knew that the defendant was flicker in the front and rear, and that I knew that the defendant was flicker in the front and rear, and that I were able to recognize credibility because the victim's statement was consistent with the victim's statement about the main part that the victim exceeded the rear due to the defendant's act, ② the victim of this article center's staff at the present site exceeded the victim's flick, and that the defendant was flick in the front of the investigation record No. 2 of the police (No. 252)". Do. 6444.