예금반환
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On June 1966, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff entered into an installment savings contract with the Defendant on an oral basis with the content that the Plaintiff would transfer USD 30 to the Defendant each month, and that the Defendant would pay KRW 10 million after one year.
However, since the defendant did not pay the above installment savings to the plaintiff, the plaintiff sought payment of the above KRW 10 million to the defendant, which is the amount converted into the market price at the present price.
2. The plaintiff's claim is without merit, since there is no evidence to support that the plaintiff concluded an installment savings contract with the defendant as above and paid USD 30 per month.
3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.