특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (limited to eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, 40 hours of order to attend a lecture, and 80 hours of order to provide community service) declared by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: although the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes in this case, the crime in this case is against the defendant, the crime in this case is likely to be punished for drunk driving even though the defendant suffered bodily injury due to traffic accidents that occurred due to neglect of prior demand by the defendant, and thus, the nature of the crime is not weak, such as escape without taking relief measures for the victim; the defendant has the history of being punished for various crimes; and other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; and the sentencing guidelines of the Sentencing Committee of the Supreme Court are comprehensively taken into account: the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence after the crime; circumstances after
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.