A. The sentence of imprisonment (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) imposed on the Defendant by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unfair.

2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case, and that the defendant's profit derived from the crime of this case is not significant is the circumstances favorable to the defendant.

However, in light of the following: (a) the number of crimes is not so many; (b) the crime was committed on a systematic basis; (c) the crime of this case was committed without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was in the period of probation; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, method and circumstance after the crime; and (e) all of the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct, environment

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.