However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On August 6, 2013, at the underground parking lot in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) discovered the Defendant, who was under the command of 112, with the notification that there was a person who causes damage to property; (b) discovered the Defendant, a slope F, and Gman, who was under the command of the E-gu, sent out, after searching the said telecom, was able to see the Defendant’s name and resident registration number; and (c) confirmed the Defendant’s domicile, number, etc. through a portable inquiry device after asking the victim’s name and resident registration number; (d) confirmed the Defendant’s domicile, number, etc.; and (e) caused the victim’s injury, such as cutting the body part of the body part of the victim one time, which requires medical treatment for about 28 days.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on dispatch duty of 112 reported police officers and inflicted injury on G at the same time.

2. At around 02:06 on the same day, the Defendant insultingd the victims by openly talking them to the victim’s slope J, such as “I of the newspaper delivery service site I and 7-8 police officers of the same fee,” “I of the instant case, I of the instant case,” and “I of the instant case before I of the instant accident, I of the instant case, I of the instant case,” and “I of the instant case, I of the instant case, I of the instant case, I of the instant case, and of the instant case, I of the instant case, I of the instant case, I of the instant case, and of the instant case, I of the instant case, I of the instant case, and of the instant case, I of the instant case.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to J, L, M, G, and K;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant is against the will of the defendant and efforts to recover from damage;