On May 28, 2018, at around 03:35, the Defendant: (a) while drinking alcohol with the victim D(36 tax) in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the ground that the injured person made the Defendant’s speech “Is that I would expect to sopha”, and (b) as a result, the Defendant had a mutual vision, on the left hand of the two main glass, which is a dangerous object at that place, and had the victim’s face face on the right side of the victim one time at the close of the victim’s face, the Defendant saw the victim as an unsatisfing face of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of an accident under injury;

1. Report on internal investigation (the details of the victim's credit and E in the case at the time of the incident);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing in Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Code of the pertinent legal provision on criminal facts is based on the victim’s face value, which is a dangerous object, without any justifiable reason, and the victim’s face was at least 10 centimeters in length, 10 centimeters in depth, and at least 1 centimeters in length, on the victim’s right bream, and the case was very heavy and bad, and the victim’s written agreement was submitted to an investigation agency after the occurrence of the case. However, the victim expressed his/her intent not only to properly pay the medical expenses agreed upon by the defendant during the prosecution investigation process after the occurrence of the case, but also expressed his/her intent to punish the defendant, and in light of the type, content, and degree of damage caused by the crime of this case, the victim was submitted as above, and thus, made best efforts to recover damage caused by the crime of this case or to recover damage by the defendant.

It is difficult to see that the defendant has been punished twice for violent crimes, but he/she again commits the crime of this case despite the fact that he/she committed the crime of this case, and the defendant acknowledges all the charges and made his/her mistake.