도로법위반
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On May 2, 2003, the Defendant, as his employee, violated the restriction on the vehicle operation of the road management authority by operating the relevant truck with a load loaded with freight of 11.13 tons of 11.13 tons of 2 livestocks in excess of 10 tons of the restricted axis at the 19:12 main office of the central expressway 7.4km branch of the central expressway.
2. As to Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995); or Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Act No. 866, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8976, Mar. 29, 2008; Act No. 10655, Dec. 24, 2011; Act No. 10681, Dec. 31, 2017; Act No. 10688, Dec. 14, 2015; Act No. 8677, Mar. 2, 2007.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.