Nevertheless, at around 00:15 on December 16, 2018, the Defendant intentionally contacted with the vehicle by means of intentionally shocking the left-hand bridge by inserting the front side of the vehicle's size after the Defendant's driving at the 21-lane B, which is driven by the witness E (the age of 21) on the one-lane of letter among one-lanes on the front side of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

As a result, the Defendant claimed insurance money from the C insurance company that caused personal damage due to an accident, and received a total of KRW 1,80,000, and KRW 2,952,710 under the name of medical treatment expenses, and KRW 1,80,000 under the name of agreement due to personal damage.

2. In a judgment, the burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt is between the defendant, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(2) In light of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant intentionally stored a bridge near the top-down side of the passenger car volume, at the time and place indicated in the facts charged, and intentionally sealed the left-hand bridge, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(1) Examining screen pictures submitted by a prosecutor, they contact vehicles driven by E with the accused.