2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant made a confession of all of the crimes of this case and reflects the depth of the crime of this case, that the crime of this case was committed on a single-time medication, that the crime of this case was committed on the part of the victim of damage to property, that the defendant deposited one million won on the part of the victim of damage to property, or that the defendant was punished four times as a crime of the same kind. In particular, even though he was sentenced to imprisonment on November 7, 2014 due to the crime of scopon medication, he was sentenced to imprisonment on the part of one year and two months, and again committed the crime of damage to property during the period of repeated crime, that he committed the crime of damage to property, that the court below did not yet agree with the victim of damage to property, that it appears that the court below set the punishment by taking into account the circumstances favorable to the defendant in light of the sentencing of similar cases, and that the sentencing of the crime of this case was too unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.