2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant are that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and reflected, and that there was an aspect that caused the instant crime by changing the car line rapidly in the future on which the Defendant was driving.

However, the crime of this case threatens the victim by passing a vehicle by using a dangerous object, which is a vehicle of the defendant, for the reason that the victim was rapidly changing the vehicle of the defendant while driving a vehicle. In light of the motive of the crime and the risk of the method of the crime, etc., it is extremely poor that the crime is committed in light of the motive of the crime and the risk of the method of the crime. It is inevitable that the crime of retaliation is severe punishment due to the crime that may cause serious danger to the driver of the other vehicle or the passenger, as well as the driver of the other vehicle in the latter. The defendant has been sentenced once to a suspended sentence due to violent crime even before the crime of this case. In full view of the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant and other factors such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, the means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of various sentencing as shown in the arguments of this case, such as the situation before and after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.