beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.03.10 2017고단230

출입국관리법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities in the Republic of Korea.

Nevertheless, from August 19, 2016 to February 2, 2016, the Defendant operated the 5th floor of the 5th floor of the commercial building located in Seo-gu in Gwangju City, Gwangju, and employed Thailand E and F without the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities as female employees.

As a result, the defendant employed foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment in the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Accusation of immigration offenders, each notice of decision on judicial review of entry or departure, and application of each statute stated in the certificate of employment of foreigners;

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the relevant Act and Article 18 (3) and (1) of the Immigration Control Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of penalties;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are the criminal records of the Defendant, including the criminal records of two suspended sentence.

The defendant employed foreigners as stated in the facts charged of this case to arrange sexual traffic and was punished as a fine in the criminal trial.

The defendant did not pay 4 million won a penalty imposed due to the instant case.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.