2. Defendant.

The defendant corporation as the parties to the contract is the business entity that constructed and sold an officetel located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B C and D (hereinafter referred to as "the instant officetel"), and the defendant CCG Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "CCG Construction") entered into a contract for the construction of the instant officetel (hereinafter referred to as "the instant contract") with the defendant SPP City and constructed the said officetel.

The plaintiffs are co-owners of sectional ownership who are currently owned by being transferred from the defendant U.S. Forest City after they directly concluded the sales contract of the instant officetel with the defendant U.S. Forest City or transferred the status of the purchaser from the purchaser of the instant officetel.

On May 22, 2002, Defendant U.S. Forest City commenced the construction on or around March 3, 2003 after obtaining permission for the construction of the instant officetel. On October 13, 2002, the sales contract for the instant officetel with the Plaintiffs, etc. (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

On September 24, 2004, Defendant U.S. Forest City obtained approval for the use of the instant officetel, and then delivered the instant officetel to the Plaintiffs around that time.

The Defendants, when constructing the instant officetels, did not construct the parts to be constructed in accordance with the design drawings, or constructed in a false manner or differently from the design drawings, thereby causing defects in the instant officetels outer walls, interior cracks, water leakages, etc., and resulting in any trouble in functions, fine views, or safety in the instant officetels.

The plaintiffs requested the defendants to repair the defects in the instant officetel, and part of the defendant Cream Construction.