On December 2, 2011, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s right buckbucks that he had been taking lessons on the next fucks of the right bucks, when he was engaged in art lessons within the Institute of Art in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si at around 13:00.

2. The defendant's assertion and defense counsel's assertion and defense counsel argued that even though D and his her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her mm

3. We examine the judgment, and examine the credibility of each of the statements of the witness D, E, F, G, and H, the respective legal statements of the witness D, E, F, G, and H as well as the police statements of the D, F, and E, and there are complaints of the E, and examine the credibility of each statement of D, E, F, G, and H.

(1) The mother of D statements that “E continues to ask for the reason that D after the incident, it would be replaced by a private teaching institute,” and thereafter, E calls to F, the first generation of the private teaching institute, to confirm the Defendant’s assault.” However, D statements that “E is not fit for the change of the private teaching institute, and how E knows the Defendant’s assault.” The statements are inconsistent with each other.

In addition, D made a statement that “D was in the vicinity of the Defendant at the time of assault, and there was no other child.” However, F, claiming that D had observed the scene of assault, made a statement that “D had seven to eight children around the Defendant at the time of assault from the Defendant,” and the contents of D and its statements are inconsistent with each other.

Shed D stated that the season during which he was assaulted by the Defendant was not memory, but that D was in the short clothes at the time, and that it was stated in the facts charged.