If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On October 14, 2012, at around 19:16, the Defendant, within the final police box of Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno Police Station D in Jongno-gu, Seoul, sent a notice of attendance of a summary judgment due to an act of disturbance of drinking alcohol by the victim E, who is a police officer belonging to the above police box, and sent the victim a notice of attendance of a summary judgment due to the act of disturbance of drinking alcohol by the victim E, which is a police officer belonging to the above police box, and made the victim public insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim by saying, “I am frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, frith, and so on.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on witness E’s legal statement;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the defense counsel's claim under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the defense counsel's assertion of the provisional payment order is argued in the process of protesting against the notice of attendance at the summary trial and that the pertinent abusive act was in a state of mental and physical disability as it does not violate social rules. However, the instant abusive act cannot be deemed a justifiable act, and the Defendant cannot be deemed to have reached a state of mental and physical disability due to drinking, and each of the above arguments is rejected.