However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 23:40 on December 1, 2019, the Defendant: (a) falsely speaked that, “I would like to be asked about the relationship with the said female helpers,” and “I would like to be asked by the slope F of the Daca Police Station D police box sent out after receiving 112 report that “I would go to a Class 2 business establishment,” while drinking and singing together with female helpers, the Defendant tried to listen to the statements by dividing the female helpers from the Defendant, and “I would like to see this, I would like to see, “I would like to be in a pete, mack, off the face, hick, hick, and pushed out by assaulting the above F,” and opened the floor of the Defendant to “I would like to listen to the statements by separating the female helpers from the Defendant.”

Accordingly, the defendant received 112 reports and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the control of police officers dispatched to the scene and the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect examination of G police officers;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The criminal place;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes by cutting off a working log or screen pictures related to the obstruction of performance of official duties;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a sentence, and the choice of imprisonment (in light of the content of criminal conduct, consideration shall be given to the fact that the criminal is not bad in light of the substance of criminal conduct, the circumstances after the criminal

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that a suspended sentence has been recognized as unlawful and there is no record of punishment heavier than a fine);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;