However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 27, 2018, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 06:00, at “C hotel” in Sinst City B, the Defendant changed the construction section used at the time when the Defendant worked in the said hotel to the victim D, who is the above hotel operator, and the victim did not keep the construction section.

The reason is that the victim was made, and the victim was fested, and the victim was frightened, and the "pact."

The same brush, "I", "I", and the same brushes, brushes, and may operate in the future.

I. “Along about 40 minutes, such as taking a bath with a large sound, customers who want to be accommodated in the said hotel shall be prevented from entering the hotel.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's hotel business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (in the absence of previous convictions or fines against the accused in excess of the same criminal records or fines, it shall be taken into account that the accused has a criminal record of four times of violence, the degree of interference with business, and the absence