beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.03.15 2018고단142

특수협박

Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the defendant A is above two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On January 21, 2015, Defendant B was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of road traffic law in the Gwangju District Court’s net support, etc., and completed the execution of the said sentence in the Gwangju District Court on March 6, 2016. On November 6, 2015, Defendant B was sentenced to five months of imprisonment for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective dangerous weapon, etc.) at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on August 4, 2016. On July 21, 2017, Defendant B was sentenced to two years and six months of imprisonment for a violation of duties in the Gwangju District Court’s net Support, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 29, 2017.

[2] The Defendants: (a) committed a crime on March 13, 2017, at a time below the net 06:00 square meters; (b) on the ground that Defendant A, who was known to the general public, offered jobs only to Defendant B; and (c) Defendant B recruited the victim while raising the victim on the ground that the victim was dismissed in the workplace where the victim was introduced and was dismissed.

Accordingly, from 06:00 on the same day to 09:40 on the same day, the Defendants got to move to the victims on several occasions, and called “ soon as soon as possible at the inner border point”.

After threatening knife, death, death, and death of the victim at around 10:46 of the same day, there is a threat that the victim was "F" in the operation of the victim in 10:46 of the same day, and the defendant B collected flife disease, which is a dangerous object, and flife the victim as the victim might flife the victim, and the victim "the flife flife flife flife flife flife flife flife flife flife flife.

Cp. The knife shall be discarded.

In the end, the injury was discarded and the victim was threatened.

As a result, the Defendants, by carrying with them all dangerous things, acted as if they would inflict harm on the victims, and threatened the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D.