beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.19 2017고합173

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is deaf-mutes.

On February 10, 200, the Defendant was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Changwon District Court on December 15, 200; six months from the Ulsan District Court on December 15, 200; six months from the Jeju District Court on August 26, 200; imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on January 27, 2005; imprisonment with prison labor for eight months from the Gwangju District Court on March 2007 to the attempted larceny; imprisonment with prison labor for ten months from the Gwangju District Court on March 20, 207 to the attempted larceny; imprisonment with prison labor for one year from the Changwon District Court on April 16, 2009 to the Gwangju District Court on June 16, 201 to the Gwangju District Court on March 16, 201 to the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Gwangju District Court on June 4, 2010 to the Gwangju District Court on March 16, 2016.

On June 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) opened a string door, which was not corrected at the Southern-gun, Goi-gun, Nado-ro 191, 191, from the Southern-do-ro 191, and entered the seat of C Freight vehicle, and subsequently stolen KRW 4,20,000 in cash owned by the victim D, who was in the contact with the location of C Freight.

As a result, the defendant is habitually sentenced to the crimes of Article 329 of the Criminal Act at least twice, and the execution of the sentence is completed or exempted, and again commits the crimes of Article 329 of the Criminal Act again within three years.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Photographs (CCTV image, etc.);

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A certificate for disabled persons;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: A written reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, and results of search of prisoners;

1. Habituality of the judgment: Each criminal history of the judgment, the applicable law and expertise of the crime of this case, and the same number of criminal defendants within the short time after release.