If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

around 16:20 on May 12, 2012, the Defendant was on the part of the Busan city located in the Busan city located in the Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and was on the part of the victim C business taxi operated by the victim B, despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee, the Defendant pretended to pay the taxi fee, and said that the victim was on the part of the Busan city bus terminal located in the Busan Simpo-dong, Busan, and caused the victim to arrive at the destination.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, did not pay 19,100 won of the taxi fee, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;