However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 9, 2016, the Defendant was required to take work from F, such as D employee E, while drunkly enjoying a shock in the area of approximately 04:0 Ulsan-gu C2, Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul, and the shock.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 술에 취하여 일어나지 않고 있다가 같은 날 04:45 경 위 E에 의하여 112 신고를 받고 출동한 울산 남부 경찰서 G 지구대 소속 경장 H, 순경 I로부터 술값을 계산하고 귀가할 것을 종용 받고 “ 범죄혐의를 소명해 보라”, “ 짭새 새끼들” 이라고 소란을 피우다가 위 H으로부터 신분증 제시를 요구 받고 위 H이 수첩에 피고 인의 인적 사항을 기재하려고 하자 갑자기 손으로 위 H의 오른쪽 손목을 잡아 밀고, 이를 제지하는 위 I의 양손을 뿌리친 후 위 I의 멱살을 잡은 후 양손으로 위 I의 가슴을 밀고 손등으로 위 I의 왼쪽 뺨을 1회 때렸다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the H and the above I on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to I, F, and E;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs and field photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of punishment for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (from June to one year and six months) [the person subject to special sentencing] [decision of sentence] [the defendant assaultss a police officer who performs legitimate duties in accordance with the report of 112, and interferes with the performance of public duties by taking advantage of his or her desire to insult the personality of a police officer, etc. In that sense, the above act is not good and there was a record of being sentenced to suspension of indictment and fine due to interference with the same kind of criminal injury and duties before the instant case, and the attitude in the course of investigation and trial is considered as the attitude.