If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

1. Defendant A’s obstruction of business is the customer of “C Burial” in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the victim D and the victim E are the employees of the above branch.

At around 12:20 on July 31, 2019, the Defendant: (a) visited a customer at the above place to take care of the victim D, and obstructed work between approximately 20 minutes by force, such as taking handphones and bags.

2. From 12:35 on the date of the above 1.1.35, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender at the above place and handed over to the F police box, and the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance for about one hour, such as “Chos, bottles, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor,” and fluoring fluor G and seven other persons performing official duties while under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Reports on internal investigation (including attachedD, E statements, photographs, etc. with respect to refusal to affix a written confirmation of arrest or detention suspects and a written confirmation of arrest);

1. Reports on internal investigation (victim E telephone call);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports ( telephone communications with H of witnesses);

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of the cancellation of the head of a government office);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;