The request for the attachment order of this case is dismissed.

Defendant

In addition, the person subject to the request for attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant") and the victim F (the remaining, the age of 63) are the Dong rent that works as the G apartment security guard in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On April 5, 2017, the Defendant performed the planting work with the victim and H, and returned to 4 seconds of the above apartment expenses at the 3 seconds of the above apartment expenses, which were the place of drinking alcohol, at the 4 seconds of the above apartment at the 3 seconds of the above apartment expenses. On the same day, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was able to kill the victim who found the Defendant at the 4 seconds of the above expenses without any particular reason and 18:20 meters of the same day at around 18:20 on the same day.

In addition, the victim’s left head part is flive once, and the victim’s remainder is 21 cm in length and 32 cm in total length.

In addition, 7 parts of head, 5 parts of head, 7 parts of head, 7 parts of the upper body, 1 parts of arms, 1 parts of the bridge, and 1 parts of the bridge have the victim die immediately with sniff.

As such, the Defendant killed the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution of H and I;

1. Statement by the J police;

1. On-site reports on results of field identification, a survey report on actual conditions, and a survey report on autopsy;

1. On-site photographs, photographs of criminal implements, and photographic photographs of the crime subject to the application of Acts and subordinate statutes, the confiscation of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 was ordered, but they were kept at the portrait of apartment expenses (the investigation record No. 155 pages of the investigation record), and owned by the defendant;

Since it cannot be deemed as a thing for which the owner or owner is unknown, no sentence of confiscation shall be imposed.

1. Determination as to the assertion of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act and Article 250(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts

1. The Defendant alleged that he had worked after drinking with the victim and H, and returned to the beginning of his own expense. However, the Defendant did not pay the drinking value when the victim found the place to be the victim and her drinking room.

As a result, the defendant assaults the defendant.