상해
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal (the factual error and inappropriate sentencing)
A. The victim first pushed the Defendant, thereby leaving the Defendant’s arms onto the part of the victim’s her her m, and while the Defendant gets out of the victim’s her m, the Defendant was either a convict who was on the part of the victim’s her mar in the process of taking out the victim’s her mar, but the Defendant did not injure the victim by assaulting the victim.
B. Even if a person is guilty, the lower court’s imprisonment (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The following circumstances found by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) The victim's statement is reliable due to consistency in the main parts of the defendant's crime of this case, including the background leading up to the crime of this case, the method and degree of the defendant's use of violence, and the victim's side part; (ii) the victim suffered not only the body of cage of cage cage, the knee's knee's knee's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne and kne's kne's kne's kne's kne's kne and kne's kne's k's k.
Therefore, the judgment of the court below is just and there is no error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment.
The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.
B. Although the Defendant had a number of identical criminal records, such as multiple criminal records on the assertion of unfair sentencing, the Defendant re-offending the two criminal records during the suspension period due to the same kind of criminal records, the injury suffered by the victim is not easy, and the Defendant still remains.