beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2021.02.03 2020고단2018

특수공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2020, the Defendant, around 14:50 on February 14:50, 2020, stated that D’s executive officer of the Seoul Northern District Court’s Seoul Northern District Court’s Seoul Northern District Court’s 2019Gadan 139221, the Seoul Northern District Court’s order was defective to enforce a compulsory execution against the delivery of real estate in accordance with the above execution officer’s order, and that C’s blade (10cm in length on the day, 25cm in total) is a dangerous object cited by the Defendant’s vehicle.

B. A. The term "a......................"

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the compulsory execution of the delivery of real estate by the court enforcement officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Protocols of seizure, list of seizure and photograph of seized articles;

1. A written statement;

1. Field photographs, etc.;

1. Each investigation report (victim F, G telephone communications);

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Articles 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act provides that a crime is not good to be committed in which a person interferes with the performance of official duties by carrying a knife for the reason for sentencing, and the degree of interference with the performance of official duties is not significant, the relevant enforcement officer does not want the punishment of the victim, and other circumstances revealed in the arguments, such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, situation before and after the crime, and motive for the crime, as indicated in the order, shall be determined.