2. The judgment is a favorable condition to the defendant that the defendant led to confession and reflects the crime of this case, and that the amount of fraud is a small amount.

On the other hand, the following is disadvantageous.

The Defendant was punished several times, including imprisonment with prison labor, for fraud.

In particular, the criminal act of May 17, 201, which was committed on May 17, 2016, which was released from a repeated crime due to the same crime, was committed on May 17, 2016, and was arrested as a criminal act on May 17, 2016, and was released on May 18, 201, and the same crime is likely to be committed again on the 18th day of that month.

Until now, damage has not been recovered.

It is also very dangerous that the method of committing the crime of obstruction of business and damage of property is also very dangerous, such as the removal of small-scale soldiers and tree chairss.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, etc., and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, even if considering sufficient circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.