Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On January 31, 2018, around 11:00, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s management-related business tendering process by force, such as: (a) the Defendant’s management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based suppliers from D, the manager of the above management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based management-based

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Recording CD 1 and on-site photographs (the defendant alleged to the effect that the illegality of the act constitutes legitimate acts, etc. permitted under the social norms that prevent D, etc. from undergoing an unfair bid, but the above argument is rejected as it is without merit)

Application of Statutes

1. Article 314 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.