However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 30, 2014, at around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) displayed a beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table table, on the ground that the victim E speaks it; (b) took a ker’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table table, and assaulted the victim as the ker’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table table of the coffee shop, (13 cm in blade length, 24 cm in the total length) on the ground that the victim E speaks it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1148, Jan. 1, 201; 201Do1135, Feb

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (recognisive of discretionary mitigation) or more;