Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal against the defendants and the plaintiffs' claim against defendant E added in the trial.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court of first instance to explain this decision is that it is not sufficient to acknowledge that the Defendants failed to properly grasp the number of papers during the election process of the members of the meeting of this case on the sole basis of the statement of No. 3 and the testimony of the witness M of the first instance court No. 17 of the judgment, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise. The statement of No. 3, No. 15, No. 25-1, No. 28-2, No. 29, No. 31, No. 36-1, No. 36-2, and No. 37 through No. 40 of the judgment of this case is insufficient to recognize that the Defendants failed to properly grasp the number of papers during the election process of the members of the meeting of this case, or obtained the allocation of papers to the court of first instance different from the actual number of papers by applying for the approval of the members of the meeting of this case on the basis of the false statement.