2. The defendant.

The plaintiffs in the status of parties are those who were appointed as reserve teachers of the D University E Campus Reserve Forces operated by the defendant (hereinafter referred to as the "School Group of this case").

On April 14, 2006, in the Army of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the “Land”) entered into and renewed a labor contract, the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport publicly announced on April 14, 2006 that nine reserve teachers including the instant school group will be selected for a ten-year contract term, and the Plaintiffs applied for the said selection.

On September 26, 2006, the Army, including four plaintiffs, recommended the defendant as a faculty member of the school group of this case. The defendant finally employs the plaintiffs as a faculty member, and the working conditions on September 26, 2006 between the plaintiffs and the plaintiffs.

(b) Type of contract: Annual salary contract;

(c) Contract term: from October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2009, pursuant to an agreement with the Army Headquarters (Convention No. 2-B) and each year after the first three-year contract, a contract may be concluded by up to ten years in total.

The following contents of employment contracts were concluded:

On October 1, 2009 when the above employment contract was terminated, the Defendant entered into an employment contract between the Plaintiffs with each other, setting the contract period from October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010, and the Defendant separately pays retirement allowances and pays interim accounts each year.

2. D.

4) Added.

2. Positions to which he is appointed: Professors of contract;

3. Period of appointment: From September 1, 2010 to February 28, 2011 (six months);

4. Number of beams.

(c) Retirement allowances shall be paid separately;

8. When the defendant does not appoint the plaintiff again after the expiration of the contract term, he shall not issue a separate order, such as notification of dismissal, and the plaintiff shall retire ipso facto on the date when the contract expires

On September 1, 2010, when the above labor contract is pending, the Plaintiffs entered into an employment contract with the Defendant by changing it into a contract for the appointment of a teacher on a contractual basis, and the main contents thereof are as follows.

Since then, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant concluded a contract from March 1, 201 to February 29, 2012, from March 1, 2011, to February 29, 201, from March 1, 2012 to February 28, 2013, and from March 1, 2013 to February 28, 2014.