Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

1. On October 26, 2016, the Defendant damaged the property by gathering glass cups and lives, etc. on the table, on the ground that there was a difference in opinion while communicating with employees D at the Busan Shipping Daegu B and the six-story entertainment station, Busan, Busan, and the six-story entertainment station, and the victim of the defect about to go without calculating the drinking value, and prevented the victim from going through without calculating the drinking value.

2. When intending to board an elevator at the same time and place as the Defendant used assault, the Defendant sought payment of alcohol value, and assaulted the victim’s face and breath in six times, when the victim D calls for payment of alcohol value.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment against the crime, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of each fine);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;