The argument that the judgment below erred in the violation of the principle of balance of punishment, the principle of responsibility and the principle of equality, constitutes an unfair argument in sentencing.

However, examining various circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the Defendant’s age and character environment, relationship with victims, motive, means, and consequence of each of the instant crimes, etc., even if considering the circumstances asserted in the grounds of appeal, it cannot be deemed extremely unfair to maintain the judgment of the first instance court that sentenced the Defendant 22 years of imprisonment with prison labor.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.