For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that convicted the Defendant of the facts charged.

The recognition of actual authenticity of a protocol in which a public prosecutor made a statement by a person other than the defendant is recorded is acknowledged as the content of the protocol is recorded as the person making the original statement, and its contents are not acknowledged as true.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, misapprehending the legal doctrine on admissibility of evidence, omitting judgment, etc.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.