A. The defendant asserts that there was an error of law by misunderstanding the facts that he invested KRW 4 million in connection with the operation of the illegal game room E, and that the defendant provided game products not rated in collusion with E and F for use, and exchanged the tangible and intangible results acquired through the use of game products in collusion with E and F, and that there was an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts.

B. The Defendant asserts that the lower court’s imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment and additional collection KRW 100,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. 1) The facts charged in the instant case are prohibited from providing a game for distribution or use, or displaying or keeping the same for that purpose, and from exchanging, exchanging, arranging for exchange, or re-purchasing the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game. Nevertheless, the Defendant convicted the Defendant of the charges of this case by providing the game of this case for use by many unspecified customers who did not receive a rating in the instant game room from October 1, 2013 to October 3, 2013, the Defendant offered to operate the illegal game room together with E, the joint unemployment owner and F, the director and the exchange employee, and then making a public invitation to operate the illegal game room at the window D2 of Changwon-si. The lower court convicted the Defendant of the charges of this case by providing the game of this case with 5,00 won per share on the points obtained by the customers by installing 15,00 won per share on the game room.

3) The joint principal offender under Article 30 of the Criminal Act is a joint principal offender under Article 30 of the Criminal Act. In order to establish joint principal offender, the principal offender is a subjective element.