beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2011.05.04 2010가합83927

손해배상(기)등

Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that aims at the management participation and control of other corporations through ownership of shares, and holds 82.1% of the shares issued by G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) with the Internet portal services, which is an Internet portal site, and P2P services.

The daily economy of the defendant is a company for the purpose of publishing and selling newspapers, and the daily economy of the defendant is publishing and publishing the daily economy of the newspaper, and the defendant Hochicom is a company for the purpose of data communications network and telephone business, such as the Internet, PC, etc., and operated online newspaper.mk.co., Ltd. (ww.m.C.r) and receives articles from the daily economy of the defendant and publish them.

B. At approximately F17:48:05, Defendant Hojacom published the article, as described in attached Table 3 that K reporters coverage, as the title “D” at the top of each of the two pages B, the daily economy of each of the Defendant, and the first page of each of the two pages B, respectively (hereinafter “instant article 1”).

C. In addition, at around L 17:48:36, Defendant Hoh.com published the article as shown in the [Attachment 4] covered by M flager as “E,” and the Defendant’s daily economy as “E,” respectively, as the title “E,” in [Attachment 4] A24.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-2-2, Eul evidence 6-1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Claim against the first engineer of this case

A. A. Around June 2003, N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “N”), an affiliate of the Plaintiff’s assertion, entered into a printing contract with Defendant daily economy, which is a free newspaper issued by N, and paid a total of KRW 30 billion each year by May 2009. Around April 2008, upon receiving a proposal to print an newspaper at a lower price than that of the Central Publication Co., Ltd., the Defendant’s daily economy on the grounds of the expiration of the printing contract period.