2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On August 2012, the Plaintiff, who is engaged in cargo transport business using B-Vehicles (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), entered into an entrustment contract with the Plaintiff for the ground management of the instant vehicle, around August 2012. The Defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of trucking transport business, freight brokerage business, etc.

B. From August 1, 2012 to August 28, 2012, the Plaintiff transported cargo over 25 times as indicated below.

날짜 업체 운송구간 운송료 부가세 합계 비고 8/1 C(D) 증평/2-밀양 280,000 28,000 308,000 8/3 E 대구-파주 290,000 29,000 319,000 8/4 E 안산-대구/2/거창 340,000 34,000 374,000 8/6 F 김천-양제/가락 260,000 26,000 286,000 8/7 C(D) 용인-밀양 260,000 26,000 286,000 8/7 G 대구-울산 150,000 15,000 165,000 8/8 H 언양-대구 130,000 13,000 143,000 8/9 I 대구-남양주 230,000 23,000 253,000 8/11 C(D) 용인-밀양 250,000 29,000 279,000 8/13 F 김천-양제/일산 280,000 28,000 308,000 8/14 F 김천-시화 240,000 24,000 264,000 8/14 C(D) 충주-미양 260,000 26,000 286,000 8/15 F 김천-청주/수원/일산 280,000 28,000 308,000 8/15 C(D) 용인-밀양 260,000 26,000 286,000 8/16 C(D) 용인-밀양 250,000 25,000 275,000 8/16 F 김천-수원/시화 270,000 27,000 297,000 8/17 C(D) 용인-밀양 250,000 25,000 275,000 8/20 F 김천-성남 240,000 24,000 264,000 8/21 C(D) 용인-밀양 250,000 25,000 275,000 8/22 G 대구-대전 160,000 16,000 176,000 8/23 F 상주-인천 250,000 25,000 275,000 8/27 J 군위-하남 250,000 25,000 275,000 8/27 K 오산-구미 170,000 17,000 187,000 8/27 L 청도-인천 280,000 28,000 308,000 8/28 E 안산-밀양/양산/부산 390,000 39,000 429,000 [인정근거] 다툼 없는 사실, 갑 제1, 3호증, 갑 제6 내지 8호증, 을 제6, 7호증의 각 기재, 변론 전체의 취지

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is a cargo transport from August 1, 2012 to August 28 of the same month at the Defendant’s request.