If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

From October 1, 1999, the Defendant entered into a contract for the establishment of a current account with a branch of a corporate bank and has traded household checks.

On May 2012, the Defendant issued, respectively, a check number H, issuance date, and one copy of the household check in the “G” office operated by the Defendant in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, as the price for goods, at the lower court’s office, as indicated in the attached list Nos. 1 through 4, 9, and 10, a total amount of KRW 60,000,000,000, as stated in the attached list No. 1 through 4, 9, and 10.

However, each holder of the above check presented each payment to the above bank within the payment deadline, but the defendant was not paid due to the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each accusation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing H, check number I, check number J, K, check number L, check number M;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act (Selection of Fines) concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 2 (2) and (1) of the same Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part concerning rejection of prosecution under Article 6 of the Control of Illegal Check Control Act, Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged was issued by the Defendant, as indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 5 through 8, a total of 4 copies ( check number B, C, D, E), and a total of 20 million won, respectively, at the places indicated in the facts charged in the judgment of the Defendant.

However, each holder of the above check presented each payment to the above bank within the payment deadline, but the defendant was not paid due to the suspension of transaction.

2. According to Article 2(2) and (1) of the Illegal Check Control Act, where a person who issues or prepares a check receives the check pursuant to Article 2(4) of the same Act and collects the check, the charges of this part of the facts charged cannot be prosecuted.

However, according to the records, the defendant's indictment of this case.