However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On September 14, 2015, the Defendant, at around 17:20 on September 14, 2015, was under the influence of alcohol at a police box of the Sungsung-gun Police Station C, which is located in the Sungsung-gun B, and whether “after the discharge of a plastic box” is stored.

“A police box affiliated with the C police box, which tried to keep a sound and confirm its circumstances, assaulted D with “A”, “B B beyond the Dob Police Station, L.”, and used a mobile phone towards D’s line, her hand, teared D’s right-hand Australia, her face, displayed D’s chest and her flab, and her flabed, thereby obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in which statements made by the police in D are recorded;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing guidelines [the type of determination] the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment] [the scope of the recommended punishment] fundamental area [the scope of the recommended punishment] 6 months to 1 year and 4 months [the general sentencing person] - the mental and physical weakness of the mitigated punishment (the person in question is responsible)]

2. Whether to add a stay of execution - Other reasons for general consideration - No effort to recover negative damage is made - Reasons for general consideration: positive reflection.

3. Six months (two years of suspended execution) of imprisonment with prison labor sentenced to a sentence;